<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are You Still Writing ADM Templates?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-policy/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-policy/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates</link>
	<description>on applications, desktop and Terminal Server deployment, virtualisation and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Distribution of Registry key script &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-policy/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates/comment-page-1#comment-13709</link>
		<dc:creator>Distribution of Registry key script &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/uncategorized/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates#comment-13709</guid>
		<description>[...] you will have to search for something that has been bought and borged by Microsoft. Read this:  http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-p...-adm-templates  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you will have to search for something that has been bought and borged by Microsoft. Read this:  <a href="http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-p...-adm-templates" >http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-p&#8230;-adm-templates</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stealthpuppy / Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions Available</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-policy/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates/comment-page-1#comment-13175</link>
		<dc:creator>stealthpuppy / Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions Available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/uncategorized/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates#comment-13175</guid>
		<description>[...] come from Microsoft. Could this mean the end of the logon script? Hopefully it will at least see the end of custom ADM templates. Multiple Group Policy Preferences have been added to the Windows Server 2008 Group Policy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come from Microsoft. Could this mean the end of the logon script? Hopefully it will at least see the end of custom ADM templates. Multiple Group Policy Preferences have been added to the Windows Server 2008 Group Policy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stealthpuppy / New Group Policy White Papers</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/group-policy/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates/comment-page-1#comment-8440</link>
		<dc:creator>stealthpuppy / New Group Policy White Papers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/uncategorized/why-are-you-still-writing-adm-templates#comment-8440</guid>
		<description>[...] previouly written about the free DesktopStandard PolicyMaker Registry Extension, but unfortunately it appears that this tool is no longer available for download.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previouly written about the free DesktopStandard PolicyMaker Registry Extension, but unfortunately it appears that this tool is no longer available for download.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
