<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome on Windows 7 x64</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64</link>
	<description>on applications, desktop and Terminal Server deployment, virtualisation and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:57:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64/comment-page-1#comment-13726</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64#comment-13726</guid>
		<description>It probably is, but getting Chrome running is better than no Chrome at all. I also run as standard user, never admin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably is, but getting Chrome running is better than no Chrome at all. I also run as standard user, never admin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asf</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64/comment-page-1#comment-13725</link>
		<dc:creator>asf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64#comment-13725</guid>
		<description>is --no-sandbox not kinda bad to use? you loose the whole point of chrome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is &#8211;no-sandbox not kinda bad to use? you loose the whole point of chrome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
