Comments on: Google Chrome on Windows 7 x64 http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64/ on application delivery with application virtualization, server-based computing, desktop virtualization and more Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:12:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: L Nair http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64/#comment-15978 L Nair Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:55:00 +0000 http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64#comment-15978 I tried Virtualising Chrome on a Windows 32 bit App-V 4.6 Sequencer. When you use the plugin "--no-sandbox", I get the following error upon opening Chrome. "You are using an unsupported command-line flag: --no-sandbox. Stability and security will suffer." Is there any way to get rid of this. If I use the plug in --in-process-plugins", Chrome doesn't open up at all. Any help would be appreciated. Latha. I tried Virtualising Chrome on a Windows 32 bit App-V 4.6 Sequencer. When you use the plugin “–no-sandbox”, I get the following error upon opening Chrome. “You are using an unsupported command-line flag: –no-sandbox. Stability and security will suffer.” Is there any way to get rid of this. If I use the plug in –in-process-plugins”, Chrome doesn’t open up at all. Any help would be appreciated.

Latha.

]]> By: Aaron Parker http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64/#comment-13726 Aaron Parker Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:21:56 +0000 http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64#comment-13726 It probably is, but getting Chrome running is better than no Chrome at all. I also run as standard user, never admin. It probably is, but getting Chrome running is better than no Chrome at all. I also run as standard user, never admin.

]]> By: asf http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64/#comment-13725 asf Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:14:13 +0000 http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/windows/google-chrome-on-windows-7-x64#comment-13725 is --no-sandbox not kinda bad to use? you loose the whole point of chrome is –no-sandbox not kinda bad to use? you loose the whole point of chrome

]]>